Cost and material used in this fuel system

Material used for this fuel system is 

the proposed vehicle consists of at least the following components:

· Solar panels (on vehicle roof) very small which is for safety we can use it or we can make it optional it will depends on the company so the solar panels are

 (not required)

· Battery (2)

· Device to capture and separate CO2 from air - 

· Device to split (2) CO2 in (1) C2 and (2) O2 - 

· cylindrical 2 fuel tank one is 50 Litres and another is 5 litres Tank for h2 and c2h2

· Device to generate  (acetylene, C2H2) out of C2 and H2

· internal combustion engine normal used for gasoline 

(depends on the company so which engine you will use you can mention here)



Cost see here:-


 So view the cost how much does this car will cost now you can tell that this fuel system car is the best car

Car battery (2) :- 200$

Device to capture air and CO2 and seperate the CO2        :- 100$

Device to split CO2 and make all process and make the CO2 as a C2 and o2 will be cost around         :- 100$

Device to genrate c2h2 from C2 and h2 will be cost.         :- 50$

Cylinder 50 litres fuel tank it will be cost around         :- 150-200$

Cylinder 5 litres fuel tank it will be cost around         :- 25-35$

Engine depends what will be used by the company :- (mention your engine value here)

Total cost to build this :- 625-685$


And you can see how this car will be look here :-



And you can see the electric car:-

Fuel system also see it will be cost around for the battery only 4000-6000 $ 

Dc converter cost :- 2200$

So here you can see only dc conventer and battery will cost more still there are more parts we want to calculate so view here




also Company will be get this doubt even so I am solving before about this are majority of doubt will be raised so view this a little


 Gaseous fuels, including H2 and natural gas, have a low (volume) energy density. C2H2 offers only slightly higher energy density than natural gas. In addition, high-pressure tanks, due to their necessarily spherical shape, are difficult to package in a vehicle. Therefore, it is very difficult to utilize gaseous fuels in high-performance vehicles and sports cars with customer acceptable range.

· The on-board generation of C2H2 utilizing H2 requires two fuel tanks for two different gaseous fuels, plus the CO2 capturing device. This is very difficult to realize in any of our passenger cars, without compromising range, passenger or luggage space.

· Besides package space, the overall system is much heavier than "conventional" liquid fuel internal combustion engine or battery electric powertrains. Therefore, the power to weight ratio is unsuitable for sports cars.

· The CO2 has to be captured from ambient air, has to be split into C2 (and O2), and has to be processed to C2H2, using electric energy from the solar roof. The exact power demand for all these sub-processes is not specified but has to be assumed to be significant. The roof area is limited and realistic electric power output in most regions of the world is significantly below power demand of vehicle for / while driving. Therefore, the vehicle would require significant "on-board refueling" stops to replenish the C2H2 reservoir - in addition to "conventional" refueling stops for H2. Customer-satisfying range or average travelling speeds seem to be very difficult to realize.

· C2H2 combustion shows very high flame temperatures, which is highly appreciated in welding. State of the art internal combustion engines for gasoline or diesel fuel would have to be expensively redesigned for this fuel. In addition, high flame temperatures increase NOx pollutant formation, which would significantly increase the exhaust aftertreatment effort in terms of cost and packaging space.

· To our knowledge, the generation of C2H2 is a complex process, involving e.g. an electric arc with resulting energy demand and package requirements.

· The CO2 captured from ambient air is neither extracted permanently from the atmosphere, nor is the O2 released permanently. Instead, the internal combustion engine of the vehicle will emit the amount of CO2 captured earlier, and extract the amount of O2 released earlier, with only short delay. That means, the vehicle's operation might be CO2-neutral (if the H2 was generated CO2-neutral) but will not help to decrease the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.


Gaseous fuels, including H2 and natural gas, have a low (volume) energy density. C2H2 offers only slightly higher energy density than natural gas. In addition, high-pressure tanks, due to their necessarily spherical shape, are difficult to package in a vehicle. Therefore, it is very difficult to utilize gaseous fuels in high-performance vehicles and sports cars with customer acceptable range.


and first point is this so


Yes I will also support you in this but yes obviously it is some what true but h2 is a normal gaseous fuel low volume and eneragy density and c2h2 is also offers only slightly higher energy density that natural gas and also in addition gases are high pressure and so they want to be necessarily spherical shape and you has been mentioned are difficult to package in a vehicle but I want to tell that gaseous c2h2 fuel is the best fuel for the high performance vehicles and sports cars and this can be produce a high torque than electric and gas fuel system and also this can be produce a high power to the vehicle and also So by this sport cars and super car can be produce more speed that gas Vehicles and electric vehicles and so this can produce a lot of more speed so it is best fuel for the highly performanced vehicle and sports so it has high torque and high power and high speed than has and electric vehicles


The on-board generation of C2H2 utilizing H2 requires two fuel tanks for two different gaseous fuels, plus the CO2 capturing device. This is very difficult to realize in any of our passenger cars, without compromising range, passenger or luggage space.

and second point is

Yes there is on board generation of c2h2 and I want to tell there are two different gaseous fuel tank but there is some what a change because yes there are two fuel gas tank but some to same it take the same amount of space required for the petrol and diesel fuel tank because we will use two tanks but here one is bigger and one is smaller and I want to tell that  The biger tank for the h2 and another is for c2h2 which is smaller and the larger tank is 50 litres capacity and smaller one is 5 litres so why I has been so the h2 will be filled in 50 litres tank and c2h2 is converted and used in 5 litres tank and this is fuel efficiency and the when we full tank with h2 then we can run nearly 1500 - 2000 miles with the full tank and this 5 litres tank will be only fill when vehicle start then the h2 and C2 will convert and make the 5 liter tank full and then stop converting and after using the. It will convert again by this it will fuel efficiency 


And You has been mentioned there should be no luggage space and boot space and correct Passenger space



So I has been mentioned All problem solution at the image I has been given below view that image that will show complete passenger 4 or 5 seater car so view it that will solve you problems


Besides package space, the overall system is much heavier than "conventional" liquid fuel internal combustion engine or battery electric powertrains. Therefore, the power to weight ratio is unsuitable for sports cars.


And 3rd point is

So overall system is so lighter than liquid fuel first view image it much lighter power of weight ratio is suitable for the sports vehicle and this can produce much power and speed that normal liquid fuel and electric vehicle so it is also clear

· The CO2 has to be captured from ambient air, has to be split into C2 (and O2), and has to be processed to C2H2, using electric energy from the solar roof. The exact power demand for all these sub-processes is not specified but has to be assumed to be significant. The roof area is limited and realistic electric power output in most regions of the world is significantly below power demand of vehicle for / while driving. Therefore, the vehicle would require significant "on-board refueling" stops to replenish the C2H2 reservoir - in addition to "conventional" refueling stops for H2. Customer-satisfying range or average travelling speeds seem to be very difficult to realize.


And 4th point is

Yes the CO2 is captured from the air and has been splitted into C2 and o2 and has been processed to c2h2 using electric energy and some what pressure and I want to be tell that the most of the process is done by the pressure and others some factors and very few important process is done by electric energy like capturing the CO2 that some small amount of process and per mentioned we will be charge the battery by the solar panel and more the solar energy is stored in another batter for backup purpose if there is any problem with the main battery if the main battery occurs any problem or dead in the middle of the journey so there is a backup battery and on that time this backup battery will help and another main battery will chage by the solar panel and I want to tell yes in some cases if there is lack of the solar power in some regions like in some seasons especially on the winter and rainy season in that season there is not enough sun energy by that has been undertaken by me and also we has been mentioned a new thing that now a days we can see the hybrid cars the both liquid fuel and battery used for the travelling so when liquid fuel is used then it will automatically charge the battery when engine runs so here also we use the same technology here we will charge when engine runs also so I want to mention that there is very few usage of the battery in this and battery usage is Also very less here


Another thing is that the fueling process about it when the customer has been fuelled vehicle with the h2 full tank then the vehicle can run nearly 1500- 2000 miles non stop and it can be move at very faster than the normal car it more fuel efficiency than liquid fuel and electric fuel so this is factor I want to tell so there is 100% satisfaction for the customer with this vehicle there is customer satisfaction range and speed first of all I will give example

I has been taken ford endeavour when full tank it will be a 372 miles

And electric car range when fully charged is highest 412 miles

And same to same this fuel system car range is 1500 to 2000 miles it will between around 

So here this car fuel system can give a high range so because there is theory proof for it 


So this doubt is clear


C2H2 combustion shows very high flame temperatures, which is highly appreciated in welding. State of the art internal combustion engines for gasoline or diesel fuel would have to be expensively redesigned for this fuel. In addition, high flame temperatures increase NOx pollutant formation, which would significantly increase the exhaust aftertreatment effort in terms of cost and packaging space.


And 5th point is

So you has been mentioned that C2h2 is the the high flame temperature I obey with it but you has been mentioned that high flame temperature increases the NOx pollutants formation but there is some small change


And I want to tell that there is a research done that with is the best fuel are not produce the green house gases then the best fuels are been mentioned that C2h2 and h2 are the fuels which will not produce majority of the the green house gases and this are the eco friendly fuel also so yes the c2h2 is high flame temperature gas but there is a positive point for this vehicle is that which fuel have the less number of hydro carbons they are green house gases free so there are the least hydro carbons in the c2h2 so this point make it as green house gases and pollutants free so NOx pollutants are not produced by c2h2 so this problem is cleared


Sorry for you has been mentioned that is will take more packaging space so view the image it will show how small amount of packaging space is required to use this in the vehicles


And in terms of cost it will cost lesser than the electric vehicles so this is the best for the vehicle

The CO2 captured from ambient air is neither extracted permanently from the atmosphere, nor is the O2 released permanently. Instead, the internal combustion engine of the vehicle will emit the amount of CO2 captured earlier, and extract the amount of O2 released earlier, with only short delay. That means, the vehicle's operation might be CO2-neutral (if the H2 was generated CO2-neutral) but will not help to decrease the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

And 6th point is

The CO2 is extracted from the atmosphere and the o2 is released permanently from the vehicle with the CO2 extraction and when using car the vehicle will not emit the CO2 captured earlier so it will be stored and will be Converted when the vehicle started and this cannot be emit faster than the conversation the conversation process is very fast and also internal combustion done so there is no problem in this point
this conversation process is very fast as the normal petrol and diesel vehicle internal combustion done in seconds so same to same this process is looking a lot but it is much faster than the liquid fuel so also when the CO2 enters this process once then it will converted so there there is no problem in this point also the

And I want to tell that o2 is not required to for this process but the o2 will extracted from this process so the o2 will alway release and it is not used in this vehicle and every element and compound is not neutral I want to tell every element has been used in this vehicle except the o2 which is released 

And I want to tell that you has been mentioned that it will be not decrease the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere it is wrong but it can be decrease the CO2 in concentration in the atmosphere I want to tell the conversation rate about it 

1 car can convert nearly 5 tonnes of co2 into O2 in a day

1 million car can convert 5 million tonnes of co2 into O2 in a day

1.825 billion tonnes with in a year with the 1 million cars only so you can imagine about it

100 million cars can convert 500 million tonnes of co2 into O2 in a day 

182.5 billion tonnes of co2 into O2 in a year so

Here I want to tell every sale can convert CO2 in o2 every day so

Every sale can convert so we want to sell and the car will help and if we can continue this type of selling than we can make it as trend and every one will buy this car because it can change the CO2 concentration and after we can start its production we can Convert a maximum percentage of co2 into O2 and make the earth the best One

So I want to tell we can control the 70% of global warming and also we can end the CO2 in the earth but there is no proper percentage I can mention a single if we sell more than we can stop and convert the more CO2 into O2 but I can tell if we start production then we can convert nearly 30-40% CO2 in earth into O2 I can tell and if we can sell more cars than we expected so we can convert even more but we can take the 30%-40% in our control within 1 year of period I can be confident to tell this so 

I think I have answers to all your problems and questions for you so

So this is proof that acetylene can be run vehicle more range so view it there is a experiment done and been saw this result

Weight of one small car is 2.7 tons, and average running distance is 400 km, so full tank of acetylene can run around 600 km. We also compared weight differences between gasoline and acetylene-powered engine. Existing configurations for fuel injection in a gasoline-engine will be adapted for acetylene.

And so this is the fact I want to acetylene is the best fuel and my process is also the best one for you and you can view this prototype of the vehicle there is same process but I has been mentioned in a passenger car



This just a self questions like FAQs I has been made gave you this procedure




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tesla idea

NASA